Reposts kill reach. Here’s why.

Day 90/100

 

Hey—It's Tim. 

Monday, 8:02 a.m.
I was still half-dreaming in HTML when I slammed the “Share” button on LinkedIn.

Same carousel.
Same caption.
Same everything I’d shipped last Thursday.

Result? Reach −47 %. 
Two polite likes (thanks Mum).

That’s when it hit me: repost culture doesn’t just feel lazy — it looks lazy to every algorithm in town.

 

I refresh my feed … and LinkedIn ghosts me

First clue: company pages are now lucky if they scrape 1–2 % of a user’s feed. LinkedIn’s 2025 algorithm straight-up prefers humans with hot takes over brands with boilerplate.

So when I reposted last week’s rant word-for-word, the algo yawned.

I tried again.
Same asset.
Added two fresh lines of context on the Google AI Overview chaos.

Bam: impressions almost doubled.

 

1. The “RT first, read never” trap

Hop over to X.
Twitter’s own open-sourced code shows that a reply is worth 27X a retweet in the “For You” feed scoring.

Translation: every naked retweet tells the algo (and your followers) you didn’t have the energy to think.

I learned that the hard way when I reflex-RT’d a fake “leaked Google doc” -twelve DMs corrected me before my espresso cooled.

Credibility? Bruised for a week.

 

2. Cross-posting? More like cross-poison

Instagram’s Reels team has said it out loud: videos carrying another platform’s watermark get down-ranked. 

Adam Mosseri confirmed it last week on his own reel.

I checked a friends social numbers:

  • Raw TikTok repost 👉 3.2 % engagement

  • Same clip re-shot natively 👉 9.4 %

Nine extra points for ten extra minutes. Bargain.

 

3. Google’s duplicate detector tightens the screws

Still think copy-pasting press releases is “efficient”? Google’s 2024 spam policy now lists “thin, duplicated, or low-quality content” as reason enough for algorithmic smack-downs.

In our crawl of 50 SaaS blogs, sites that relied on syndicated PR lost an average 18 % traffic month-on-month after the March core update. First-hand POV isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s rank insurance.

 

You can’t repurpose trash.

You can only repackage it.

If you're reposting the same 42-second clip with a new caption and calling it a strategy... you're not repurposing. You're reheating.

I wrote a 2,700-word guide on how to do it properly.
Real strategy. Real formats. Real workflows.

And if you need content worth repurposing?
You should be using Penfriend.ai.

It writes. You remix.
Chef’s kiss.
🧑‍🍳👌

 

So when is a repost okay?

  1. You add at least 10 % new oxygen—a counter-take, a dataset, a meme remix.

  2. You remix the format
    thread → carousel,
    TikTok → GIF,
    press release → personal breakdown.

  3. You credit + link the source. (Audiences despise thieves.)

Everything else? Have a match in hand and be ready to use it.

 

See you tomorrow with something original.

✌️ Tim "Burn after reading" Hanson
CMO @Penfriend.ai

Same brain, different platforms: X, Threads, LinkedIn.

P.S.
I’m not saying don’t repurpose. I’m saying don’t sleepwalk.
If it didn’t take effort, it probably won’t earn attention.

 

Penfriend.ai
Made by content marketers. Used by better ones.
 

What to do next

  • Share This Update: Know someone who’d benefit? Forward this newsletter to your content team.

  • Get your First 3 Articles FREE EVERY MONTH! We just dropped the biggest update we’ve ever done to Penfriend a few weeks ago. Tone matching with Echo, Hub and Spoke models with Clusters, and BoFu posts.

  • Let Us Do It For You: We have a DFY service where we build out your next 150 articles. Let us handle your 2025 content strategy for you.